UNCOVER HIDDEN CVD RISK WITH
A VAP LIPID PANEL
More than 600,000 people die
of heart disease every year, making the need for more accurate risk
stratification even more urgent(1)
- Heart disease accounts for 25% of all US mortalities(1)
- 1 in 3 US adults has 1 or more types of cardiovascular disease (CVD)(2)
- CVD kills more women each year than the next 4 causes of death combined(3)
- Vascular disease is either under-diagnosed or under-treated in women(4)
Basic lipid panels (BLPs) are
inaccurate and inadequate at assessing
residual risk in all patients
- 50% of patients hospitalized with coronary artery disease had “normal” cholesterol: admission low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol <100 as="" basic="" by="" dl="" li="" lipid="" measured="" mg="" panels="">
- Over 75% of patients with myocardial infarction (MI) fell within current guideline-recommended targets for LDL as measured by basic lipid panels(5)
- Patients with diabetes are at increased risk for MI, stroke, amputation, and death(6)
- Diabetes causes metabolic abnormalities that induce vascular dysfunction, which predisposes this population to atherosclerosis
LDL is often underestimated
and does not reveal true risk
·
Calculated LDL using the Friedewald equation—the
foundation for basic lipid panel test results—was found to be highly variable
and strongly influenced by triglyceride (TG) concentrations(8),*
·
The magnitude of underestimation in Friedewald LDL
often leads to under-treatment based on ATP III categorization(8),*
o For
patients with normal TG levels <150 10="" 70="" a="" adult="" approximately="" be="" category="" dl="" higher="" into="" is="" mg="" of="" p="" patients="" population="" reclassified="" risk="" the="" which="" would="">
- Direct LDL measurement should be used to assess true risk:
- LDL <100 dl="" mg="" tg="">200 mg/dL; specimen is non-fasting; patient is at moderate or high risk for CVD9-11 LDL status alone does not identify all patients at risk for cardiometabolic disorders100>
·
LDL accounts for 30% of the risk of premature CVD,
while the remaining 70% represents additional risk factors(13)
·
The VAP Lipid Panel includes a comprehensive assessment
of cardiometabolic risk factors
* Results from a recent independent investigator–initiated
study involving 1.3 million adults that examined National Cholesterol Education
Panel, Adult Treatment Panel (NCEP/ATP
III) Guidelines and commonly accepted standards of care. 8
VAP=Vertical Auto Profile.
References:
1. Gutstein
DE, Krishna R, Johns D, et al. Anacetrapib, a novel CETP inhibitor: pursuing a
new approach to cardiovascular risk reduction. Nature.
2012;91(1):109-122;
2. Roger VL,
Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, et al; on behalf of the American Heart Association
Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and
stroke
statistics—2011 update: a report from the American
Heart Association. Circulation. 2011;123(4):e18-e209; 3. Association
of Women’s Heart Programs. Final report. The National
Coalition for Women With Heart Disease Web site.
http://www.womenheart.org/healthCarePro/upload/AWHP_Report_Final-3-11.pdf.
Published March 2011. Accessed May 10, 2012;
4. Vouyouka
AG, Kent KC. Arterial vascular disease in women. J Vasc Surgery.
2007;46(6):1295-1302;
5. Sachdeva
A, Cannon CP, Deedwania PC, et al. Lipid levels in
patients hospitalized with coronary artery disease: an
analysis of 136,905 hospitalizations in Get With The Guidelines. Am Heart J.
2009;157(1):111-117;
6. Beckman
JA, Creager
MA, Libby P. Diabetes and atherosclerosis:
epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management. JAMA.
2002;287(19):2570-2581;
7. Superko
HR. Did grandma give you heart
disease? The new battle against coronary artery
disease. Am J Cardiol. 1998;82(9A):34Q-46Q;
8. Sniderman
A, Toth P, Kwiterovich P, et al. Clinically meaningful underestimation
of LDL-C by Friedewald at levels below 70 mg/dL: a
study of 1.3 million adults [very large database of lipid (VLDL)]. Presented
at: American College of Cardiology 61st Annual
Scientifi c Session; March 24-27, 2012: Chicago, IL.
Summarized in: Cobble M. Atherotech Medical Affairs Bulletin. Published March
2012;
9. Scharnagl
H, Nauck M, Wieland H,
März W. The Friedewald formula underestimates LDL
cholesterol at low concentrations. Clin
Chem Lab Med. 2001;39(5):426-431;
10. Nauck M,
Warnick GR, Rifai N. Methods for
measurement of LDL-cholesterol: a critical assessment
of direct measurement by homogenous assays versus calculation. Clin Chem.
2002;48(2):236-254;
11. Third
report of the expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high
blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III): fi nal report.
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Web site.
http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/cholesterol/atp3full.pdf.
Published September 2002. Accessed May 10, 2012;
12. Stampfer
MJ, Ridker PM, Dzau VJ. Risk factor criteria.
Circulation.
2004;109(25 suppl 1):IV3-IV5;
13. Kreisberg
RA, Oberman A. Clinical review 141: lipids and atherosclerosis: lessons learned
from randomized controlled trials
of lipid lowering and other relevant studies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(2):423-427;
14. Tremblay
M, Gaudet D, Brisson D. Metabolic syndrome and oral markers of
cardiometabolic risk. J Can Dent Assoc.
2011;77:b125;
15. Jellinger
PS, Dickey RA, Ganda OP, et al; AACE Lipid Guidelines Committee. AACE medical
guidelines for clinical practice for the diagnosis and treatment of
dyslipidemia and prevention of atherogenesis. Endocr
Pract. 2000;6(2):162-213;
16. Grundy
SM, Cleeman JI, Merz CN, et al; National Heart,
Lung, and Blood Institute; American College of
Cardiology Foundation; American Heart Association. Implications of recent
clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education
Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. Circulation.
2004;110(2):227-239;
17. The VAP® Test from
Atherotech: Physician Guide. Atherotech Diagnostics Lab Web site.
http://www.atherotech.com/images/vapliterature/pdfs/physicianguide_20110831.pdf.
Accessed June 5, 2012;
18. Peters
AL. Clinical relevance of non-HDL cholesterol in patients
with diabetes. Clin
Diabetes. 2008;26(1):3-7;
19. Brunzell
JD, Davidson M, Furberg CD, et al; American Diabetes Association; American
College of Cardiology Foundation. Lipoprotein management in patients with
cardiometabolic risk: consensus statement from the American Diabetes
Association and the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
Diabetes Care.
2008;31(4):811-822;
20. Analytical
performance of the cholesterol profi le measurement by Vertical Auto Profi le
[VAP]: analysis of NCEP III guidelines lipid analytes. Atherotech Web site.
http://www.atherotech.com/images/vapliterature/pdfs/vapaccuracywhitepaper_20110831.pdf.
Published 2011. Accessed May 10, 2012;
21. Why order
the VAP® cholesterol
test. Atherotech Web site.
http://www.atherotech.com/images/vapliterature/pdfs/why_order_the_vap_test.pdf.
Accessed May 10, 2012; 22. Study: VAP comprehensive cholesterol test improves
outcomes, reduces costs for managed care by 35% [press release]. Birmingham,
AL: Atherotech Web site. Published January 4, 2012.
Accessed May 10, 2012; 23. McAna JF,
Goldfarb NI, Couto J, Henry MA, Piefer F, Rapier GM III. Improved cardiac
management with a disease management program incorporating
comprehensive lipid profi ling. Popul Health Manag. 2012;15(1):46-51.
150>
No comments:
Post a Comment